Q Part One: Draft Submission. Complete a full draft of the introduction, body, and conclusion (including visuals) for Project 5. The peer review for next week will include drafts of your prefatory and supplemental parts. Submit your draft to this forum by clicking "Reply" and uploading your draft as an attachment. ________________________________________ Part Two: Peer Feedback. Provide peer feedback on drafts. Your instructor will assign peer partners. The following prompts should guide your peer review, an important step in drafting.* You don't necessarily have to respond to each and every prompt, but you should respond, in one way or another, to a majority of them. Don't be limited by these prompts, though. Share any and all feedback you have for your peers. *Make sure to pay attention to any directions your instructor sends via course Announcements or Canvas messages and to follow these directions accordingly. If you'd like, you can also download the questions as a Word file that you can then fill out and return to your partner(s): Assignment 5 Peer Feedback Questions Part 1.docx Download Assignment 5 Peer Feedback Questions Part 1.docx ________________________________________ Report Introduction • Is the topic of this report clearly announced early in the introduction? Suggest ways to improve the clarity. • Does the writer effectively give the reader(s) a reason to want to read this report? How? • Is the main point stated clearly? What is it? • How effective is the forecasting (preview)? Suggest improvements. • Is any necessary background information provided? Is more needed? Report Body and Conclusion • What is the organizing structure of the report, and how is this organization revealed? Are transitions, headings, and layout consistent with the approach? Offer suggestions. • Has the writer dealt with the readers’ concerns/objections? Has the writer demonstrated the benefits to the reader? • Has the writer demonstrated sound reasoning? Note any weak points. • Do the conclusions and recommendations follow logically from the discussion of possible solutions? Give examples. Do the recommendations define specific actions? • Is the evidence/research adequate to support the recommendations? What additional information is needed? • Is the report attractively and clearly designed? Comment on layout and page design. • Do the visuals emphasize important information? • Are the visuals incorporated correctly: labeled, numbered, and titled with captions and legends as necessary? Explained and/or referenced in the text? Placed after or beside the reference? Summarized in a review?